3 ms·
I assume it meant to be arg1 to showcase that the malloc for arg1 can be free'd without resulting in a use-after-free after having copied the value out of argv[
by dividuum 2y ago
I assume it meant to be arg1 to showcase that the malloc for arg1 can be free'd without resulting in a use-after-free after having copied the value out of argv[1] within the coroutine.