> they're advocating for their personal parental decisions to the be decisions of the entire nation. That sounds exactly wrong. I think they want their "person

> they're advocating for their personal parental decisions to the be decisions of the entire nation. That sounds exactly wrong. I think they want their "personal parental" decisions to not be the decisions of the entire nation, but "personal" and private to themselves and to be free from judgement for wanting this thing. > prevented access to education medical information ... you don't like these products and feel they are negative, then don't use them. This is pretty important to me: Abusive parents deny their children access to communication platforms. I believe these problems cause problems for the child if the child is already lacking support, but they also represent a way to escape that abuse, so I feel strongly that controlling access to asking-for-help is not okay; This should not be a personal decision good people can make for themselves in their homes for their own kids, because they should be able to understand that "bad" people are actually using laws and rules like this to hurt children. > I don't use any of these products I think you're using one right now: Hacker news is absolutely a communications platform.