> "Intuitive" is not an objective property, it's too polluted by habits you've learned from other systems. To an extent, but then the test is seeing how people

> "Intuitive" is not an objective property, it's too polluted by habits you've learned from other systems. To an extent, but then the test is seeing how people who have never used any system interact. I maintain the MacOS paradigm is objectively less intuitive than alternatives. > But we can say this: there's nothing intuitive about Windows' incomplete transition to the new settings app that still sometimes requires you to jump to the old control panel system; there's nothing intuitive about Linux' 50 desktop environments, each with their own incomplete configuration systems Sure, that's clumsy. Not really relevant though. > In any kind of match up, MacOS will win on simplicity and intuitiveness hands down simply because every other option is just much worse. Strongly disagree. MacOS comes in behind Windows for certain, and likely behind a couple of FOSS DEs as well. Windows has issues, but usability isn't one of them.