3 ms·

> I suspect that is what these were. This is not the case. They did this without anyone else's knowledge or approval. They were used only by the conspirators.

• skissane 3y ago
  > They did this without anyone else's knowledge or approval. They were used only by the conspirators But now the employer knows about it, they should be able to make these facilities available to any of their employees or contractors who might be able to use them, in a way which could benefit the employer. For example, if someone has to work overtime in an emergency, allowing them to stay the night in one of these apartments could allow them to save commuting time and be better rested for the next day, which could improve performance (and reduce safety risks due to tiredness). Or, if someone needs to be rostered on-call to respond to unexpected events, having them stay in one of these apartments may improve their response time if they are called in
  • infecto 3y ago
    The hurdles to get over to reach this logic path is amazing. They used employers funds without approval to build something that benefited themselves. Sure, it happened on employer property but without any type of approval. That is theft, let us not try to come up with complicated explanations to say its not theft.
  • yuliyp 3y ago
    This is the classic "oh I was only borrowing it / gonna give that back" excuse of thieves who got caught with new window dressing.