> When looked at in totality, you can see the fingerprints of the change in culture of the designers. The men that created Civ I were unapologetically part of t

> When looked at in totality, you can see the fingerprints of the change in culture of the designers. The men that created Civ I were unapologetically part of the Faustian Western tradition. Civ 6 was created by men who completely disconnected from that tradition. I know it’s twitter is my expectations on supporting evidence are pretty light but there is no meat of any of this. It’s an interesting theory, but one that it would benefit from the author actually putting any evidence into building a coherent argument rather than just lamenting Civ 5 and Civ 6 as bad games, without much explanation why.