3 ms·
But what do the goals matter? The only relevant question I can see is 'are the fingers worth the rent?' To that point, a regulation requiring "if and only if"
by thereisnospork 3y ago
But what do the goals matter? The only relevant question I can see is 'are the fingers worth the rent?'
To that point, a regulation requiring "if and only if" per unit licensing is available at (much) less than the worth of the fingers should be a no brainier.
- InvertedRhodium 3y agoGiven the relatively small market share that SawStop enjoys, you can only assume that most people feel like the fingers aren't really worth the rent.
- thereisnospork 3y agoIt's not really their choice to make though. (trivially, see seatbelts, smoking, airline regulations, ...). Should it be? Maybe, but that's a discussion out of scope from 'is it in society's interest to mandate inclusion of sawstop's technology, or it's equivalent?'.
- InvertedRhodium 3y agoAs of right now, it's 100% their choice to make. Next week, who knows?
- lobsterthief 3y agoA lot of people simply can’t afford their saws though.