3 ms·

No one should just accept that. That’s a lazy narrative being propped up by pripgafists distorting the facts. He had already testified years earlier.

by TylerE 3y ago

GaveDrohl 3y ago
Fair enough, but who won't testify in the future out of fear of being murdered? It still served a purpose of true.
benzible 3y ago
I agree that no one should just accept it, but credible people including ex Boeing execs don't dismiss the possibility.. > Discussing Swampy’s death and the whistleblower lawsuit he left behind, the longtime former Boeing executive told me, “I don’t think one can be cynical enough when it comes to these guys.” Did that mean he thought Boeing assassinated Swampy? “It’s a top-secret military contractor, remember; there are spies everywhere,” he replied. More importantly, he added, “there is a principle in American law that there is no such thing as an accidental death during the commission of a felony. Let’s say you rob a bank and while traveling at high speed in the getaway you run down a pedestrian and kill them. That’s second-degree murder at the very least.” [1] There needs to be an investigation. [1] https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-03-28-suicide-mission-boeing/ https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-03-2...
MilStdJunkie 3y ago
It's not just a lazy narrative. It's a profitable one. That narrative could help save their ass. I wouldn't be surprised if legions of paid "social media analysts" are barfing this out 24/7 on the grams and the twits. Think about it. What's going to have a better impact on your disgruntled workforce: 1) the idea that someone ratted out big Ma B, got sidelined, got sad, then killed themselves? or 2) the idea that rats get murdered? I don't know about you, but with 2 I'd be definitely be thinking twice before calling the FAA or anyone else.

No one should just accept that. That’s a lazy narrative being propped up by pripgafists distorting the facts. He had already testified years earlier.

by TylerE 3y ago

No one should just accept that. That’s a lazy narrative being propped up by pripgafists distorting the facts. He had already testified years earlier.

GaveDrohl 3y ago

Fair enough, but who won't testify in the future out of fear of being murdered? It still served a purpose of true.

benzible 3y ago

I agree that no one should just accept it, but credible people including ex Boeing execs don't dismiss the possibility.. > Discussing Swampy’s death and the whistleblower lawsuit he left behind, the longtime former Boeing executive told me, “I don’t think one can be cynical enough when it comes to these guys.” Did that mean he thought Boeing assassinated Swampy? “It’s a top-secret military contractor, remember; there are spies everywhere,” he replied. More importantly, he added, “there is a principle in American law that there is no such thing as an accidental death during the commission of a felony. Let’s say you rob a bank and while traveling at high speed in the getaway you run down a pedestrian and kill them. That’s second-degree murder at the very least.” [1] There needs to be an investigation. [1] https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-03-28-suicide-mission-boeing/ https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-03-2...

MilStdJunkie 3y ago

It's not just a lazy narrative. It's a profitable one. That narrative could help save their ass. I wouldn't be surprised if legions of paid "social media analysts" are barfing this out 24/7 on the grams and the twits. Think about it. What's going to have a better impact on your disgruntled workforce: 1) the idea that someone ratted out big Ma B, got sidelined, got sad, then killed themselves? or 2) the idea that rats get murdered? I don't know about you, but with 2 I'd be definitely be thinking twice before calling the FAA or anyone else.