2 ms·
Ok, I misremembered, it wasn't quite a decade, but the testimony happened in 2017, not recently. Why kill him almost 8 years later?
by TylerE 3y ago
Ok, I misremembered, it wasn't quite a decade, but the testimony happened in 2017, not recently. Why kill him almost 8 years later?
- salawat 3y agoUnless you've ever been a QM (Quality Manager), and a damn good one to boot, you wouldn't understand. We're a bit like Internal Affairs. We know where all the skeletons are. We take notes. To a point, as long as there is hope something'll actually get remedied, it doesn't have to go much further than that. Prove mens rea though, and we tend to be that perfect combination of places, names, who was involved, what they said, and where to find the evidence, because we were the ones who put it there. Just in case. A QA/QM with a conscience, notes, and evidence is an exec's absolute worst nightmare from the legal liability perspective. Criminal charges that pierce the corporate veil need names. If you were going to merc someone, they'd be the ones to merc.