4 ms·
> So, in other words, complaints about "Google's broeser is too good, it is unfair how fast they are moving!" Therefore ring hollow. It's an interesting concep
by wolpoli 3y ago
> So, in other words, complaints about "Google's broeser is too good, it is unfair how fast they are moving!" Therefore ring hollow.
It's an interesting concept that a company could gain a dominant position in a market involving an open standard, then lead innovations in a way that would be difficult for other companies to challenge or follow.
It's not embrace, extend, extinguish because the changes are not proprietary. Chrome is simply able to out invest everyone else with their cash from their ad business. I am not a legal expert, so I don't know if this type of cross-market subsidization is legal.
- stale2002 3y ago> Chrome is simply able to out invest everyone else Go back and read the posts even you just wrote. We already established that yes Apple could compete if they wanted. They have a 2 trillion dollar market cap.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wolpoli 3y agoMy point was that Google is taking cash from their ad business to support their Chrome product to protect their ad business. I was thinking out loud if a case could be made against Google, similar to the EEE logic.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- youngtaff 3y agoGoogle is taking cash from it’s ad business to be anti-competitive in other ways too… for example analytics, tag management etc.