4 ms·

Tokyo to Nagoya now is about 95-100 minutes: 50 minutes is the time difference, not the current duration. It's a little over twice as fast. I also imagine that

Tokyo to Nagoya now is about 95-100 minutes: 50 minutes is the time difference, not the current duration. It's a little over twice as fast. I also imagine that like the (cancelled) HS2 in the UK, a major driver is not only faster journeys (though HS2 was a much more marginal time saving, certainly not half) but relieving capacity on the existing "stopping" line, which has 365 trains a day, 450,000 daily passengers and is the busiest high speed line in the world.

danw1979 3y ago
HS2 is only cancelled if you live in the north east and pay no tax.
- eynsham 3y ago
  This misses the main benefit of HS2 which is making the network as a whole more efficient by eliminating bottlenecks. When people say ‘we should improve regional rail services’, they ignore that HS2 is what that looks like. And, frankly, if HS2 doesn’t reach Euston, it’s nearly cancelled for many Londoners due to the inconvenience. https://www.londonreconnections.com/2023/hs2-a-high-speed-beeching/ https://www.londonreconnections.com/2023/hs2-a-high-speed-be...
  - danw1979 3y ago
    What bottleneck between London and Birmingham exists that is making my journeys from York to Leeds so fraught ? Are you trying to convince me that HS2 is worth my tax £s because it’ll make TPE services better ?? No more capital expenditure should be allocated to London bound rail services until the northern corridor line (Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, York, Hull) has been substantially upgraded or replaced.
    - eynsham 3y ago
      I agree that the segment north of Birmingham was important for removing bottlenecks, including those that affect services from London. That is precisely why I think it makes little sense to regard HS2 as meaningfully cancelled only for those in the northeast. The cancellation is a problem for everybody.
    - switch007 3y ago
      I do love it when HS2 is sold as the solution to all rail congestion everywhere in the UK. Absolutely hilarious that in fact a separate rail upgrade project is underway between Manchester and York, unrelated to HS2

danw1979 3y ago

HS2 is only cancelled if you live in the north east and pay no tax.

eynsham 3y ago
This misses the main benefit of HS2 which is making the network as a whole more efficient by eliminating bottlenecks. When people say ‘we should improve regional rail services’, they ignore that HS2 is what that looks like. And, frankly, if HS2 doesn’t reach Euston, it’s nearly cancelled for many Londoners due to the inconvenience. https://www.londonreconnections.com/2023/hs2-a-high-speed-beeching/ https://www.londonreconnections.com/2023/hs2-a-high-speed-be...
- danw1979 3y ago
  What bottleneck between London and Birmingham exists that is making my journeys from York to Leeds so fraught ? Are you trying to convince me that HS2 is worth my tax £s because it’ll make TPE services better ?? No more capital expenditure should be allocated to London bound rail services until the northern corridor line (Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, York, Hull) has been substantially upgraded or replaced.
  - eynsham 3y ago
    I agree that the segment north of Birmingham was important for removing bottlenecks, including those that affect services from London. That is precisely why I think it makes little sense to regard HS2 as meaningfully cancelled only for those in the northeast. The cancellation is a problem for everybody.
  - switch007 3y ago
    I do love it when HS2 is sold as the solution to all rail congestion everywhere in the UK. Absolutely hilarious that in fact a separate rail upgrade project is underway between Manchester and York, unrelated to HS2