If I was 'michaelt I would love if someone pointed this out for me so that I didn't have to: 'michaelt said (and you quoted): > The only differences are [one

If I was 'michaelt I would love if someone pointed this out for me so that I didn't have to: 'michaelt said (and you quoted): > The only differences are [one thing] ... and whether it's applied progressively, so the rich pay a bigger share. Your reply seems to be repeating and slightly expanding on that, but because you started it with this: > There's also the difference of... It sets up an expectation that you intended to refute something about the parent comment submitted by 'michaelt. But I can't find anything in the content of your message which disagrees with the parent comment.