This seems to be in the same vein as the Rabbit R1 [0], software, not hardware. I'm very excited to see what Apple comes up with this year and going forward. Th

This seems to be in the same vein as the Rabbit R1 [0], software, not hardware. I'm very excited to see what Apple comes up with this year and going forward. They are uniquely (possibly along with Google though I'm not as aware of the OS hooks Android provides here) positioned to expose "functions" to their models that apps are already exposing to them for Shortcuts or Siri intents. It doesn't take much imagination to see them offering "Model Intents" (or some better name) where apps expose functions and descriptions of how/when to use them. Giddy doesn't begin to describe how I feel about this. Apple could also go for the more aggressive approach and allow their model the ability to interact with apps that haven't exposed specific functions. Might be useful for slow moving apps or apps that don't want to be automated. I'm of two mind on that last part. On one hand, as a developer, I can see the potential for abuse but as user I don't want to wait on app developer or wait for an interaction to be "blessed" before I can use it. For example, I love Prologue [1] (audiobook app using my Plex server) and the developer is quite good about exposing Shortcut actions but there are times where I might want to use Audible for things like WhisperSync. The issue is that Audible doesn't expose the same things I use daily (widget on homescreen to start playing my book where I left off and ability to set a sleep timer via Siri/Shortcuts. I regularly use that to extend a sleep timer while laying in bed if I haven't fallen asleep yet). I'd be interested in being able to use a LLM to add the features I want to the Audible app in those cases. [0] https://www.rabbit.tech/ https://www.rabbit.tech/ [1] https://prologue.audio/ https://prologue.audio/