3 ms·
I don't buy this argument. Given that we don't understand how and why we are conscious, it is a big leap based on pure speculation to assert that AI consciousne
by greenthrow 3y ago
I don't buy this argument. Given that we don't understand how and why we are conscious, it is a big leap based on pure speculation to assert that AI consciousness is inevitable. Our survival of the next century isn't inevitable, and I don't see us reaching AGI before then anyway. (LLMs are not a path to AGI no matter what those with vested interest in LLMs say.)
- yreg 3y ago> Given that we don't understand how and why we are conscious, it is a big leap based on pure speculation to assert that > LLMs are not a path to AGI O:)
- greenthrow 3y agoMy assertion is not based on pure speculation. There is zero evidence or rational thought that would lead you to believe LLMs will lead to AGI. Only hype.
- yreg 3y agoMy point is that you are criticising beliefs while presenting a belief of your own. We don't know if AGI is even possible, but we also don't know which technologies are going to lead to it. LLMs including.
- grantcas 3y ago[dead]