3 ms·
No, but 22% of tackled issues not being resolved correctly hints at how bad it is. Id guess that in these 22%, most of them have bugs or miss edge cases, consid
by lionkor 3y ago
No, but 22% of tackled issues not being resolved correctly hints at how bad it is. Id guess that in these 22%, most of them have bugs or miss edge cases, considering it completely failed to solve 80%.
If someone gets 20% on an exam I don't go "great, thats 20% of the way there!!!", instead I go "you clearly didnt attend, try again next time".
- bigyikes 3y ago> If someone gets 20% on an exam I don't go "great, thats 20% of the way there!!!", instead I go "you clearly didnt attend, try again next time". Sure, if little Bobby gets a 20% I’ll whoop his ass, but if the inanimate hunk of metal on my desk gets a 20% I might start to take notice.
- helboi4 3y agoSure, its sorta cool and promising for technology in the future. But as of now, we don't know how badly it might fuck up the other 78% of cases. If it fucks up like 50% of cases so badly that it takes more time for the devs to fix than it would usually, then it's a liability.