4 ms·
My point is that "opposite to what happened" has no immediate connection to what he believes. I find normal that he tried to negotiate a better deal and that h
by vladms 3y ago
My point is that "opposite to what happened" has no immediate connection to what he believes.
I find normal that he tried to negotiate a better deal and that his negotiating position was worse because he was the defaulting party.
He can still (or not) honestly believe the responsibility should be more/fully with the lender. I do agree up to some point that the richer entity should bear more responsibility, but I have a feeling his discourse is often very political (trying to mobilize and get people excited) rather than propose some realistic attainable policies.
- tmcb 3y agoNow I get it, my bad. Yes, his discourse is very political, but he does not come off as a demagogue to me. I personally think that there should be a room in the public discourse for people to come up with unrealistic policies, as realistic ones always require a compromise that benefits those in already in power. It would be very hard to carve out new avenues for social progress otherwise.