3 ms·
> you can't explain why B is moving backwards by Words, not characters or something else (is there another important context you need to know that "vim is word
by eimrine 3y ago
> you can't explain why B is moving backwards by Words, not characters or something else (is there another important context you need to know that "vim is word looking by default"?).
Yes, there is some concept inside of this. Some commands are singular such as zz, some are paired (allmost all), some are double-paired, and only one set of commands is triple-paired, this is the list:
w W b B e E ge gE
Take care to find the logic by your own, please.
- eviks 3y agoI took care, found the logic seriously flawed, explained some of the reasons above. Take care to address the substance, please
- eimrine 3y agoI don't see your attempts to understand the logic I have written. Why don't to RTFM what is the connection between the 8 commands I have provided?
- eviks 3y agoBut I do see how you fail to understand the failure of this logic, and me reading the manual again won't help you get it. So why don't you correct the assumption that you're the only one who reads manuals and try to think about the substance of the conversation?
- eimrine 3y agoListen me apprentice. You gave us the question about why b command goes backwards while most of backwards commands are capitalized with an assumption that it has to contain some logic unknown by you. You have received the logic from me. What fucking else do you want from me?
- eviks 3y agoNo, my ignorant pseudo-master, you couldn't even understand my question before trying to shrowd your supposed answer in the mystery of a manual: it wasn't about capitalization, but object type. So I've received nothing from you, bBwW doesn't cover it. And I don't want anything from you, it's pretty clear you can add nothing useful to this conversation with such a combination of arrogance and ignorance
- eimrine 3y agoWell, your clarification did not help me to understand what you are looking for, try formulating your question once more. You just told me that your question is somewhere higher.