4 ms·
Since Ballard's codec is "AI" based, can you add google's lyrav2 ( https://github.com/google/lyra https://github.com/google/lyra ) and Facebook's/meta EnCodec (
by adamzochowski 2y ago
Since Ballard's codec is "AI" based, can you add google's lyrav2 ( https://github.com/google/lyra https://github.com/google/lyra ) and Facebook's/meta EnCodec ( https://github.com/facebookresearch/encodec https://github.com/facebookresearch/encodec ).
Also I don't seem to be able to access your page, so there might be error.
Finally, when doing opus comparison it's good now to denote if it is using Lace or NoLace decoder post processing filters that became available in opus 1.5 (note, this feature need to be enabled at compile time, and defying decode a new API call needs to be made to force higher complexity decoder) . See https://opus-codec.org/demo/opus-1.5/ https://opus-codec.org/demo/opus-1.5/
- jjcm 2y ago> Also I don't seem to be able to access your page, so there might be error. Interesting, do you have javascript turned off? Can you access this page? https://html.non.io/TSAC-Comparisons/ https://html.non.io/TSAC-Comparisons/
- adamzochowski 2y agoThe page works, earlier when I tried I got a login page. This page is good. Also awesome to see comparison to EnCodec , which I think is one of the better ones available : https://ai.honu.io/papers/encodec/samples.html https://ai.honu.io/papers/encodec/samples.html Also, can you confirm if Opus decode is classical or with Lace or NoLace post processing filters that are available in Opus 1.5?
- jjcm 2y agoAlso I added EnCodec, but wasn't able to get the prereqs working for lyra2.