3 ms·

I think the fair use argument levied is fine. They are talking about using Whisper to transcribe videos and then train the model on that. Both fair use and deri

I think the fair use argument levied is fine. They are talking about using Whisper to transcribe videos and then train the model on that. Both fair use and derivative works are satisfied there. That fulfills the actual law. The terms of service though? who cares? deactivate their google account then, they can still access the videos unauthenticated. Personally I’ve made so much money off of AI generated works that would not be protected by copyright at all, that I think creators and owners of copyrighted works should re-evaluate their relationship with copyright. It seems more like copyright gives a sense of pride and accomplishment while almost no work is being monetized by its copyright or license alone.

manuelmoreale 3y ago
Just curious, how much money did you make before AI with content that would be protected by copyright? Wondering if you’re someone who was on one side of the fence and it’s now on the other.
- yieldcrv 3y ago
  hmm I’ve made a lot there too but I would say worrying about protecting that right and “doing it right” is more work than actually having a license agreement or court filing, both of which are rare It is liberating to be told “this can’t have copyright” and make enough money from entertaining the humans, who cares if it gets replicated and why didnt they just AI generate their own thing