3 ms·
ABSTRACT Scientists face challenges in publishing negative results, because most scientific journals are biassed in accepting positive and novel findings. Desp
by wjb3 3y ago
ABSTRACT
Scientists face challenges in publishing negative results, because most scientific journals are biassed in accepting positive and novel findings. Despite their importance, negative results often go unpublished, leading to duplication of efforts, biassed meta-analyses, and ethical concerns regarding animal and human studies. In this light, the initiative by Access Microbiology to collect and publish negative results in the field of microbiology is a very important and valuable contribution towards unbiassed science.
- KuriousCat 3y agoWhy are we still relying on an antiquated system to share the findings? In this era, it does not cost any where near to host a static website and share the findings, reviews, results and code openly compared to paying money to a top tier journal.