2 ms·
That's interesting, because in 2022 Musk claimed that Tesla will never settle an unjust case against them, even if they could lose it. https://twitter.com/elon
by TheAlchemist 3y ago
That's interesting, because in 2022 Musk claimed that Tesla will never settle an unjust case against them, even if they could lose it.
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1527749734668050433 https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1527749734668050433
So what does this tells us (again) about Tesla misleading marketing ?
- aeternum 3y agoWhat does it tell us? In most accidents there is shared fault. In this case, the guy was playing a game on his cellphone, no hands on the wheel. The city also hadn't replaced the safety barrier after numerous past crashes so the life-saving crumple-zone was used up. Tesla's FSD was engaged and made a very significant mistake. I'd say all three parties are to blame. If any one of those factors were missing, this likely would not have been fatal.
- mallorypaine 3y agoTesla paid out because FSD abruptly steered him out of the lane and into the barrier.
- decremental 3y ago[dead]
- yread 3y agoWe don't know if he played games. Some person declared that he did. There is a way to collect evidence from phones and it's not "let's find an apple engineer who will make a deposition." In fact, if he really played games Tesla would make sure that it can be submitted as evidence in this court so it's more likely he did not.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- choppaface 3y agoA great citation showing how Tesla does not actually care about safety. After all, Elon just turns off safety (elon mode) when he tests the car.