2 ms·
> But it is proven by Bell's inequality that such a theory cannot exist, so the spin of particle 1 is indeed a random outcome. It's still allowed so long as a)
by astrange 3y ago
> But it is proven by Bell's inequality that such a theory cannot exist, so the spin of particle 1 is indeed a random outcome.
It's still allowed so long as a) the theory is nonlocal b) the outcome was not actually independent of the observer or c) superdeterminism.