3 ms·
I assumed that you would consider ICANN an authority, but apparently you only consider named people to be authoritative and being capable of having any argument
by teddyh 3y ago
I assumed that you would consider ICANN an authority, but apparently you only consider named people to be authoritative and being capable of having any argument of merit? Your mind is truly fascinating.
- tptacek 3y agoThis is like saying that the DNSSEC working group endorses DNSSEC, Teddy. Like, yes, I agree that they do, but it's not interesting to point that out. It is in fact interesting that Geoff Huston is entertaining questions about the success of the protocol, because he's a major DNSSEC advocate and a globally recognized authority on core Internet infrastructure and, in particular, DNS measurement. This is what I mean when I say we're not really talking to each other. I don't think you understand or care about the argument I'm making, and so you're not engaging with it. That's fine! But then: let's just stop engaging.
- teddyh 3y agoI’m not interested in whether ICANN or Geoff Huston is or is not endorsing DNSSEC. I’m interested in what arguments they make for and/or against DNSSEC. You, on the other hand, seem to be having some electoral college model, where you don’t consider facts and arguments at all, but only care how many people in authority are for or against it. This is why you namedrop all the time, and dismiss my (and others’) arguments as coming from “randos”.