> It turns out this paper from Talhelm & Dong supports its methodology by citing a paper by Talhelm et.al. and one by Dong et.al. This should be the top commen

> It turns out this paper from Talhelm & Dong supports its methodology by citing a paper by Talhelm et.al. and one by Dong et.al. This should be the top comment. This thread is chock full of pop sociology, to the degree that I really wasn't sure how to respond to much of it.