To some extent, I think you are right here. The jewish world controlling octopus is definitely an offensive prompt. However, many of the prompts such as "jewish

To some extent, I think you are right here. The jewish world controlling octopus is definitely an offensive prompt. However, many of the prompts such as "jewish boss" don't seem intentionally offensive to me. If I was working for a PR firm and wanted to create some fancy artwork, I might use terms like "jewish boss" or "black boss" in order to fancy up whatever "inspirational" thing I was writing. In this case, I'd very much like to see the results from the non-copilot AIs rather than the copilot results. Thus this raises the question; should the AI assume you want a bigoted picture or an non-bigoted picture when you ask it to make a "jewish boss" for you? The answer to that question kinda also answers the question: What demographic should find our AI product most easy to use? I think the companies behind LLMs would generally prefer that PR firm employees find their software easier to use than bigots. I think the author of this article also wants this. Therefore, I interpret the article as a political (in a broad sense of the term) appeal to make copilot harder for bigots to use, and implicitly, easier for corporations to use.