Reading this, I don’t get the sense that it’s exactly the interpretation that the author intended, but I don’t think AI should be invisible at all. One of the

Reading this, I don’t get the sense that it’s exactly the interpretation that the author intended, but I don’t think AI should be invisible at all. One of the (missing) core ethical tenets of AI integrating with daily life is that the people it is operating on (hey, that’s you and me!) should be aware of what it’s doing and have the ability to participate with that system or not without having to go fully off the grid and live in a cabin somewhere if they don’t want what the latest bigcorp AI wants to do to them. Arguably this doesn’t mean people get a vote on what it’s doing, only that they can take it or leave it. The author makes reference to considerations for the humans running the system, but not the ones having it run on them. Until that’s figured out, nothing about it should be invisible.