3 ms·
The actual research is here: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xcwdn https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xcwdn I personally found this blog article to be quite i
by wildrhythms 3y ago
The actual research is here: https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xcwdn https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/xcwdn
I personally found this blog article to be quite insulting to my own intelligence by peppering in these pseudo-intellectual clichés like 'paradox of tyranny'.
- 13years 3y agoInsulting because you disagree or because it should be obvious?
- keybored 3y agoThe linked article seems to take a different normative position than the research paper. A more neutral tone would be okay if they agreed. But the author is explicitly distancing themselves from any implication that they agree that it is good to deprogram so-called conspiracy theorist. The alternative would be to sarcastically agree/celebrate the research. Which wouldn’t necessarily be obvious to everyone. But perhaps not intellectually insulting?