3 ms·
I admire their results, their method, and their will to share them with us. But I have to agree with this: my eyes can't perceive any difference.
by sscarduzio 3y ago
I admire their results, their method, and their will to share them with us. But I have to agree with this: my eyes can't perceive any difference.
- spookie 3y agoIt's less about seeing and more about feeling when typing fast.
- internetter 3y agoYeah when I drop into a TTY because I broke something again, I always go woah, this thing feels instant
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- kazinator 3y agoThe latency is literally about how late the pixels appear on the display, so it has to be about seeing. If you type fast, but still have to look at your output, it may be a good idea to wean off that; you should be able to type while reading something elsewhere on the screen, only occasionally glancing on what you're typing. Traditional typewriter typists had to be able to transcribe an existing written text (e.g. manuscript). That meant their eyes were on the text they were reading, not on their hands or the typewriter ribbon strike area.
- internetter 3y agoIf you handwrote a letter and saw it appear 500 milliseconds later, would that bother you?
- kazinator 3y agoLike the ink is invisible until exposed to air for half a second? I don't know, it might bother me, initially until I got used to it.