3 ms·
Does it take into account Wayland, and its double-buffered nature (unless you specifically opt for disabling v-sync, see the presentation protocol)?
by kaba0 3y ago
Does it take into account Wayland, and its double-buffered nature (unless you specifically opt for disabling v-sync, see the presentation protocol)?
- Hendrikto 3y ago> I ran the test on Arch Linux with Xorg
- kaba0 3y agoMissed that part, sorry. I thought one of those terminal emulators were Wayland only, hence my question.
- Jonnax 3y agoIf the 16ms latency at 60hz bothers you. Then get a 120hz display which has 8ms latency. Or there's 240hz 4k displays with 4ms If that's not enough then there's 1080p esport monitors with 540hz so 1.85ms.
- kaba0 3y agoIt doesn’t bother me, I was just interested in whether the benchmark is fair in this respect (it is xorg only, so the answer is yes). I personally believe that 120+ hz gives barely any benefit, though.