so that's not the case - the Facebook guy was lying. At absolute best, he was making a much stronger claim than he confidently could. There's continued to be i

so that's not the case - the Facebook guy was lying. At absolute best, he was making a much stronger claim than he confidently could. There's continued to be intermittent bans on the Kansas Reflector site, and there's even fresh bans on blog posts talking about the ban on the site. Also, the original KR post about Facebook still seems to be blocked from being posted on Facebook or Instagram. Someone is actively adding these URLs to the filter. There's this weird tendency to bend over backwards to assume Facebook, a company repeatedly convicted of doing malicious things, wouldn't do a malicious thing, and none of the excuses stand up to the facts for a second. Would a company run by a man who openly compares himself to Caesar Augustus try to silence its critics?