4 ms·
They're making a lot of claims and in the readme present zero measurements. The official Kafka distro is pretty bulletproof since 7+ years ago. It'd be great
by metadat 3y ago
They're making a lot of claims and in the readme present zero measurements. The official Kafka distro is pretty bulletproof since 7+ years ago. It'd be great if they could include more information for the (apparently). initiated!
I am open to new things.. with at least a tad of supporting data attached :D Ymmv.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- chenyang 3y agoHi, thank you for your interest in AutoMQ. If you have any questions regarding cost-related data, here is an analysis report for your reference: https://docs.automq.com/docs/automq-s3kafka/EJBvwM3dNic6uYkZAWwc7nmrnae https://docs.automq.com/docs/automq-s3kafka/EJBvwM3dNic6uYkZ...
- wanshao 3y agoThank you for your openness to new things. Your support is indeed very important to a new project. BTW, AutoMQ itself provides real comparison data tested on AWS, and the related code is open for users to reproduce these tests. For a cost comparison with Apache Kafka, you can refer to: https://www.automq.com/blog/automq-vs-apache-kafka-a-real-aws-cloud-bill-comparison https://www.automq.com/blog/automq-vs-apache-kafka-a-real-aw.... If you care about performance data, you can refer to our performance white paper: https://docs.automq.com/docs/automq-s3kafka/CYxlwqDBHitThCkxSl2cePxrnBc https://docs.automq.com/docs/automq-s3kafka/CYxlwqDBHitThCkx....