4 ms·
It's mostly hair that's covered anyway right? (I'm not knowledgeable on this, so please correct me if I'm wrong) I don't see why it's a problem. Even with hair
by arcastroe 3y ago
It's mostly hair that's covered anyway right? (I'm not knowledgeable on this, so please correct me if I'm wrong)
I don't see why it's a problem. Even with hair covered, the photo would still reveal facial features for identification. Hair isn't particularly identifying since hair styles can be changed easily, so I don't see a problem with allowing hair to remain covered.
- creer 3y agoAh... other articles spell it out in more detail: 1) It's any religious head covering and 2) it's "so long as their faces could be seen".