>> I just think “mass harm” is not proven. Well clearly it's been proven to the satisfaction of the court, whatever your "personal research" says. It's also b

>> I just think “mass harm” is not proven. Well clearly it's been proven to the satisfaction of the court, whatever your "personal research" says. It's also been proven to an independent science council: The C8 Science Panel, which was funded by DuPont as part of a lawsuit settlement, conducted extensive epidemiological analysis on human health outcomes from exposure to PFOA, a type of PFAS. This panel, composed of independent scientists, found links to several health harms, including two types of cancer and pregnancy-related issues, after studying blood samples from nearly 70,000 residents in the mid-Ohio River Valley. This area was significantly exposed due to its proximity to a DuPont Teflon factory (EWG). More papers come out every year finding stronger links. I wonder what your horse in this race is, my friend? [1] https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/science-pfas-rebuttal-3ms-claims https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/science-pfas-rebuttal...