4 ms·
Wrong, first they blocked the Kansas Reflector but when they fixed that the “offending” column was still blocked. That column was reposted by someone else and t
by zazazache 2y ago
Wrong, first they blocked the Kansas Reflector but when they fixed that the “offending” column was still blocked. That column was reposted by someone else and their whole website was also blocked.
There is controversy and malice
- Aurornis 2y agoThe quote in my post was verbatim copy and paste of the linked BlueSky post. If you have different information, perhaps post a valid source here rather than saying “wrong” and then injecting something else. I literally just copy and pasted the linked post text. The linked post is halfway through a BlueSky thread that has a screenshot of a part of a Twitter thread about a link to something else that I can’t click. Nothing screams “social media ragebait mill” like a long chain of unclickable screenshots to some ragebait take about some story that happened elsewhere.
- jrflowers 2y agoI think GP may have been responding to this > There is no story here, just journalists trying to stir up controversy and imply malice. Which was not a quote Assuming you’re not familiar with this story at all, here is some previous discussion of the numerous events in which the critical article was stopped from being shared on meta’s platform. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39945811 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39945811