Because “AI” or LLMs have no understanding of what they’re producing, and every single attempt to use them in an environment where basic factual correctness is

Because “AI” or LLMs have no understanding of what they’re producing, and every single attempt to use them in an environment where basic factual correctness is involved has confirmed this? Or the fact that the entire sales pitch is “this will be cheaper than actual people who know what they’re doing”, maybe a side claim of “outperforms people on our training set” coupled with “we accept no liability for inaccurate advice or poor outcomes”. The sole purpose of programs like these is to save money. It has nothing to do with helping anyone. The goal is to sound like your system is providing the service people paid for, without actually spending the money to provide that service. I will believe a company will is doing the right thing when the developers personally accept the criminal and legal liability that an actual doctor or nurse providing the service is subject to. But then to add insult to injury this just further increases the wait time for people by forcing them to deal with the “AI” before they get through to the further reduced pool of actual specialists and correspondingly increased wait times there as well. This is not rocket science to understand, and literally nothing I’ve said here is new - not the clear prioritization of cost cutting, the overselling of “AI”, and the generally unsafe use of randomized statistical models to provide factual information. My question is why you think that this time is different vs literally every other example?