4 ms·
Imagine writing something with such honesty & the people reading don't stop to reflect on how this is just one facet of how the systems they prop up push people
by crawfordcomeaux 3y ago
Imagine writing something with such honesty & the people reading don't stop to reflect on how this is just one facet of how the systems they prop up push people into operating to survive. They just judge the person, as though they live in a vacuum.
- badpun 3y agoDid the system somehow forced this man to avoid working for a living?
- sandspar 3y agoHe lives this way intentionally. He could get a job as a UX designer at Staples.com whenever he wants.
- pavlov 3y agoThere’s currently a surplus of designers with software industry experience, résumés full of business objectives achieved, and a finely honed ability to speak the soothing jargon of absolution that managers really want from UX. (“Yes, we can make users love this pop-up that you want to add. It’s just a matter of applying design.”) Why would a corporation deliberately hire a video artist and music video director instead?
- underlipton 3y agoTBF corporations don't know what's good for them. When XR was all the rage, it was current (2D) UX designers getting jobs, instead of the 3D artists, sculptors, game designers, animators, and industrial designers who actually had the skills to make compelling spatial interactions, smart objects, and experiences (which there was not a surplus of). Then, the hype collapsed, and they fired everyone who couldn't program, thereby making the issue incalculably worse.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- swatcoder 3y agoHonesty is not what the author is going for here. This is genre autofiction following a throughline of slumming, marginal artists that carries back through punk, beat, flapper, and la boheme writers. It's entertainment, not true confession or activism, and it delights in getting under the skin of squares who can't tell. No need to push back on the people reactively criticizing the character or writer -- that's the point.
- mycologos 3y agoDeliberately making art that people think sucks seems like kind of a low bar?
- swatcoder 3y agoYeah, unless you can get the cool kids to think you're cool for doing it. This kind of art is a social game, not an technical craft.
- hackable_sand 3y agoWe're meant to judge the character in the story, but the story might suck for some as well. I personally did a double take and skimmed the unimportant bits because I loathed the character. Imo the story could have easily been a piece of poetry and I would probably have enjoyed it more.
- NoboruWataya 3y agoIt don't think the aim was to write a piece that people think sucks, it was to write about a person who people think sucks. There is a difference, or at least there used to be: I feel like increasingly people are unable to separate the literary value of a piece from the moral value of its protagonist. This piece reminds me of Charles Bukowski's books about the "lowlife" Hank Chinaski. Another more extreme example of a good book with a shitty protagonist is Lolita, which IMO couldn't be published today or Nabokov would be shunned and ostracised as a paedophile. (None of this is to say you need to like the blog post, you might hate it on its own merits, but I definitely think there are a lot of people here who think it's a bad piece because they disagree with the choices the protagonist makes, which I think is a very limiting view.)