3 ms·
I would take MSN Messenger 7.5 over teams. I think most of the problems with it are related to it being pretty much a web app that runs on the desktop. If they
by culopatin 3y ago
I would take MSN Messenger 7.5 over teams.
I think most of the problems with it are related to it being pretty much a web app that runs on the desktop. If they had a nice native app that didn’t take 50% cpu to move from chats window to calendar and then made me wait for the calendar to refresh every time, the whole experience would be much nicer.
It tries to do too much and does them all half assed.
Channels and chats being separate when both have chats is just odd to me.
An option to display channel chats in the main chat window would be nice so I don’t have to manually go dig into every channel I’m a part of to see what is being said. I’m sure they have enough brains at MS to come up with a neat way of displaying that.
- uxcolumbo 3y agoGood point about the channels and chat concepts. That's really poorly handled by Teams. Nobody uses it in my team, even though we have set up some channels. It's too hidden and takes several clicks to get into. But my comment was really from the perspective of the buyer. If you're responsible for IT for a fortune 500 company, going with Teams is an easy way to save money on paper, even if it does inconvenience some of your users who live and die by Slack. EDIT: typos
- culopatin 3y agoYeah, it’s there, it’s secureable, already installed, and connects to Sharepoint, which I also hate but people love to use.
- zamadatix 3y ago> I think most of the problems with it are related to it being pretty much a web app that runs on the desktop. Most people are praising Slack instead so this doesn't make sense as the root of most problems.