3 ms·
>To get a true AGI, we would need some kind of architecture that is able to not just learn functions by example, but also grant these functions all the computin
by brap 3y ago
>To get a true AGI, we would need some kind of architecture that is able to not just learn functions by example, but also grant these functions all the computing power they need to run and thrive.
Computers can’t simulate Turing machines reliably either, and for the same reason.
This is probably true for humans also.
- jvanderbot 3y agoCan you explain why computers cannot simulate Turing machines and how that relates to the quote? My reading is that the quote says "to reach agi, it's not enough to learn a sequence of steps in text, we will want the agi to be able to crystalize (compile) that sequence of steps into a program run without abstractions on its native system." Presumably because it's too slow to run it on top of an LLM. Stretching further. I think humans do crystalize learning into things that look hardcoded, like muscle memory or reflexes, rather than talking themselves through everything.
- rsynnott 3y agoBoth humans and computers can absolutely simulate Turing machines. What are you talking about?