3 ms·
> Nobody should be subjected to mandatory fluoride in their tap water. Why? Just for the sake of freedom? I think this raises an interesting question. Suppo
by Infinity315 2y ago
> Nobody should be subjected to mandatory fluoride in their tap water.
Why? Just for the sake of freedom?
I think this raises an interesting question.
Suppose we have empirical irrefutable proof a practice is beneficial and doing so would not hinder anyone's lives whatsoever (as in, you don't have to change your lifestyle at all). Can this practice then be justified?
For example, suppose that fluoridating tap water (at least in the quantities present in most municipalities) was shown through many longitudinal studies to not have any adverse effects but was shown to have positive effects such as improved dental health. Would you support fluoridating water then?
- syndicatedjelly 2y agoSo as long as we have proof of something being good, and no proof of it being bad - we should mandate it for all citizens? (it, referring to whatever you want)
- j0hngalt 2y agoFluoride has been well proven to harm people in many ways. It's also one of the main causes of acne. It should not be forced upon people in their tap water.