3 ms·
Personally always considered it a bug in human consciousness rather than a feature of religions. I suppose that’s why I’m far more drawn to the religions that
by yawpitch 3y ago
Personally always considered it a bug in human consciousness rather than a feature of religions.
I suppose that’s why I’m far more drawn to the religions that tend to focus more on acts than faith.
- jqpabc123 3y agoWithout faith, you have philosophy, not religion. But philosophy often isn't enough to keep the masses engaged and enthralled. Buddhism started as a philosophy --- but over time, many just couldn't resist the urge to introduce faith and mysticism in the form of reincarnation --- something Buddha never taught. This happens with most religions --- including Christianity. Paul (aka Saul of Tarus) borrowed a lot from pagan mysticism that Jesus never taught.
- yawpitch 3y agoI know… hence why I prefer Sikhism (newer) and Jainism (older, Mahavir inspired Gautama Siddhartha, who — I feel, given the history of the East to West trade or the time — may well have inspired the Nazarene… who Saul then promptly corrupted beyond recognition). Feature and scope creep still points to a bug in the core of the faithful more than in the core of the faith, though.