4 ms·
Vendoring is the right attitude even if it is not the solution. Each company should know exactly its dependancies (ie S-BOM), and if there is a problem, they s
by lifeisstillgood 3y ago
Vendoring is the right attitude even if it is not the solution. Each company should know exactly its dependancies (ie S-BOM), and if there is a problem, they should look to produce their own patch and release that.
Now this second part is … a little naive, but it’s quite feasible for that to become a middle ground industry. The big distributions are fine but as a thought experiment imagine a group of ISVs focused on say python web services. They can provide an immutable nix-like definition of a simplified stack, keep a treadmill of updates and security patches, probably as binaries.
I think there is unlikely to be a way such “focused distros” will ever give up warranties so perhaps we are not making progress.
However until we live in a global socialist utopia, we need to find some way of making the “raccoon in the dumpster” get paid.
- layer8 3y agoLinux distributions like Debian (stable) are in principle such vetted dependencies that only receive security updates and are otherwise stable for a number of years. It’s a good model, and would make sense to commercialize more generally. Of course, still no one would want to take liability.