The US revolution was literally just white land owners wanting more control taxes, native lands and slavery. There was never any question of it being a revoluti

The US revolution was literally just white land owners wanting more control taxes, native lands and slavery. There was never any question of it being a revolution where the lower classes would take over. A more realistic long term option was Roman Senate like Upper class aristocracy, and that is what actually did happen in the South. > The harsh terms on Germany post-WWI all but guaranteed another war This is just false revisionist history. The peace deal was actually not that harsh. And it took a while many, many other things for WW2 to happen as it did. In fact German never even paid any of the debt that was supposedly so horrible. In fact got more money invested into them and lent to them then they ever paid out, and guess what, the never paid that back either because after WW2 that debt was forgiven. What actually made the war likely is that the US ended the war before Germany was actually defeated and then was not even remotely willing do literally anything to enforce the treaty that is had just signed. In fact Wilson basically made promises to France, and those promises were vital in a treaty being signed in the first place. And then of course Wilson couldn't actually back up those promises. So the reality is the whole peace deal collapsed in on it self as soon as it was signed. What actually made some form WW2 near inevitable was the Soviet Union trying create world revolution and particularly revolution in Germany. > and the coal-and-steel community formed after WWII provided for a peace among its european members that endures to this day More revisionist history. More like the cold war gave Europe a common enemy and the US was actually in control of the alliance. France had no realistic option not to align with with the US, and neither did the newly built West Germany. Also nukes exist.