3 ms·
> Eventually, the ecology will go back to normal. No, it won't. Remediation of these areas usually involve planting back a fraction of the biodiversity that wa
by MrVandemar 3y ago
> Eventually, the ecology will go back to normal.
No, it won't. Remediation of these areas usually involve planting back a fraction of the biodiversity that was there before, and usually cloned from the same genetic stock, making the new plants more of a monoculture and susceptible to disease and less adaptable to environmental changes.
That's the plants.
In the meantime, all the animals were pushed out of that large area (I've never seen a small mine), and then either killed their neighbors in the (assumed) adjacent ecosystem, or were killed by them. Great.
Next you'll be telling us the remediated areas are actually better than what it was before (and in my anecdotal experience some mining companies not only say exactly this, but commission studies to prove it).
- onthecanposting 3y agoThey might be better. This is opposed to say, any metropolitan area on earth, where there is no attempt to restore prior conditions at all. I think your argument is essentially an ad-hominem that asserts without evidence that mining companies are evil. I find this a bigotted point of view. My point is that the permanent disturbance of urbanization should be much more concerning than temporary disturbances.