2 ms·
I'm not a lawyer, but I think that just using the audio from youtube videos is a violation of the youtube api terms. You can read their terms here: https://dev
by freeslave 14y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but I think that just using the audio from youtube videos is a violation of the youtube api terms.
You can read their terms here: https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms https://developers.google.com/youtube/terms
Specifically they say it is prohibited to "separate, isolate, or modify the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;"
and it is prohibited to
"promote separately the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API;"
Like I said, I'm not a lawyer so my interpretation could be wrong.
I think in a nutshell they want you displaying the video because they have their own ads in the videos, and just streaming the audio cuts into their revenue.
Hate to be a wet blanket but I recently built a service using the YouTube API (http://chartbrain.com http://chartbrain.com) and so the terms were fairly fresh in my mind.
I think other services that used only the audio from YouTube have run into trouble - songza comes to mind, they were one of the first sites to do it. http://www.wired.com/listening_post/2007/11/songza-turns-yo/ http://www.wired.com/listening_post/2007/11/songza-turns-yo/
- swayfm 14y agoI didn't realize that Songza used to do that, or that they'd pivoted their product as much as they have. Their current stuff is pretty great. And yes, this is a perfect example of the types of use of the YouTube API that are specifically disallowed by their terms. They very much do not like when apps do this.