4 ms·
The headlined article was written in 1884, and it is not discussing time as "the fourth" dimension. Nor is roywiggins.
by JdeBP 3y ago
The headlined article was written in 1884, and it is not discussing time as "the fourth" dimension. Nor is roywiggins.
- lupire 3y agoGeometrically (not physically), time is isomorphic to a Euclidian space dimension. This is how movies work.