This article is the third I've seen where proprietary vendors, after the xz backdoor, try to claim that FOSS is inherently insecure. For example, > the U.S. mi

This article is the third I've seen where proprietary vendors, after the xz backdoor, try to claim that FOSS is inherently insecure. For example, > the U.S. military is shipping software that is insecure and contains many known software vulnerabilities—CVEs, in software-speak. If you use propriety applications, it's true that you'll have fewer CVEs. And of course, nobody at another company ever discovered a backdoor in their proprietary applications. (In case you don't read the tone: /s)