3 ms·
>> It wasn't a potential lie. He _had not_ secured funding. > I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that (but then again, hard to prove a negative) The SEC h
by ImPostingOnHN 3y ago
>> It wasn't a potential lie. He _had not_ secured funding.
> I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that (but then again, hard to prove a negative)
The SEC has:
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-226 https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-226
> Sure, but if we give him benefit of the doubt could have just been change of plans.
He's lost the benefit of the doubt by so frequently being dishonest, but in any case: saying you're going to do something, then choosing not to do it, makes you a liar.
- arandomusername 3y ago> Musk and Tesla have agreed to settle the charges against them without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations > He's lost the benefit of the doubt by so frequently being dishonest But so far it's down to two, tesla private and twitter committee. Hardly frequently being dishonest.
- JoeAltmaier 3y agoHow many frauds does it take to make that conclusion? Just one will suffice for most of us.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y ago"Down to two" according to who?