3 ms·
For a very large software and hardware company's local office in NZ in 2001 What they asked for: Refreshing their suit of unit tests, 10,000 of them, that had
by worik 3y ago
For a very large software and hardware company's local office in NZ in 2001
What they asked for: Refreshing their suit of unit tests, 10,000 of them, that had gone stale (that applied to their widely used C++ telephony library)
Budget NZ$1,000,000
(Don't ask what, why, really?)
I joined half way through
Half the budget spent, nothing to show, mission mysteriously changed to producing a deep packet inspection tool. (What happened to the unit tests you ask? Be quiet! Take the money)
My job was to reach deep into their system and bring the data to the surface, roughly speaking
Thing is nobody that worked on the library wanted, needed, or asked for any aspect of what were doing
The design for it was written on a whiteboard by the project lead before I joined
Then the whiteboard was cleaned.
So the design was in one man's head
That man, the project lead, quit 3 weeks before delivery
On handover day I was a bit afraid, I had taken care to keep good records of my obeying (increasingly unhinged) instructions, so I was confident I could not be blamed (I was younger and naive-not part of the story)
But I fully expected an unpleasant "you did what with our money? What were you thinking?" type of unpleasant meeting
Instead the corporate types sat around a table gushing how wonderful everything was, what a brilliant job we'd all done...
I was stunned. I understand now, I learnt that day, that it was in no-one's interest to acknowledge the waste of a million bucks
Coming from academia, as I was more or less, this was a valuable lesson.
But utterly worthless software for a million dollars
I still use some of the furniture I bought with the money....
- datavirtue 3y agoThere are multi-million dollar projects churned out and abandoned multiple times per day. Very common. I just left a company where I was contracting with a few other people for about a year. About $1.2MM down the drain. There is no hope of spinning that product up. The owners "suspended" the project and the entire brain trust evaporated. Imagine the bank owners from the movie Mary Poppins interfacing with technologists and startup founders. Whoosh...
- veb 3y agoTotally sounds like Spark :D
- worik 3y agoInternational. I heard Spark was worse, but this was not it.
- lostlogin 3y ago> Coming from academia, as I was more or less, this was a valuable lesson. Academia, where there is a reasonable budget but it’s completely impossible to spend is as the cycle of meetings, emails and fucking around is eternal.