3 ms·
I don't know whether to be impressed or horrified. Maybe both. I would recommend using top-of-tree llvm-project/main sources for building f18; we are a fast-m
by pklausler 3y ago
I don't know whether to be impressed or horrified. Maybe both.
I would recommend using top-of-tree llvm-project/main sources for building f18; we are a fast-moving project and it would be a waste of time for anybody to debug a problem that has already been fixed, or miss a feature that has already been implemented.
- tomcam 3y agoI was unable to understand the llvm source well enough to understand your point. Are they working on a WebAssembly port that will get their intermediate code to a point where Fortran works?
- pklausler 3y agoI meant that we are actively developing a new implementation of the Fortran language itself here. We are still adding features and fixing bugs. Fortran code that compiles and runs today with llvm-project/main HEAD may well not compile or not run with older release branches.
- sanxiyn 3y agoThe article uses LLVM Flang from LLVM 18.1.1. pklausler's point is that it is counterproductive and LLVM HEAD should be used instead.
- tomcam 3y agoI’m trying to understand why though