3 ms·
The main counterargument is that you have read 1000s of documents to train your brain which produces unique documents with no credit to the original copyright h
by jedberg 3y ago
The main counterargument is that you have read 1000s of documents to train your brain which produces unique documents with no credit to the original copyright holders.
GenAI is just doing the same thing on a larger scale.
- Terr_ 3y agoWell, if the concept is "we should legally treat the systems just like very big humans", then the next step is to arrest and confine all the leaders of the companies involved on charges of slavery and child exploitation. The distinction does matter in copyright too, since a transformative work needs some non-trivial amount of human input.
- BriggyDwiggs42 3y agoYep, the issue with the parent counterargument is that gen ai is a monetized tool owned and sold by a corporation. People would probably be fine with a human-like embodied ai or something learning in the same way.
- Shawnj2 3y agoIf I offered a paid service where you could pay me $20 a month and I would draw you copyrighted works that are in my internal neural network that would also be illegal