My objection wasn't the controversy - it was the lack of substance and focus. I wouldn't even call it particularly controversial. It's the same broad, general c

My objection wasn't the controversy - it was the lack of substance and focus. I wouldn't even call it particularly controversial. It's the same broad, general complaining you hear an awful lot around these parts. If you're going to be negative then you have to go the extra mile to make a particularly compelling, well-argued case. I didn't flag your article by the way.